Monday, 22 October 2012 18:57
The CIVL Bureau and others Officers are getting ready for the Bureau Autumn meeting in a few days. A look on its agenda shows that it should not be too boring...
- Decide how precise we want the minutes of this meeting to be.
- Decide if we want to turn SC and WG proposals into Bureau proposals.
Jury and Steward
Review of Jury and Steward reports for 2012 championships
- HG Euro – Kayseri, Turkey.
Jury:Flip Koetsier.
Steward:Claudia Meija.
- PG Euro – St-André, France.
Jury:Dennis Pagen.
Steward:Ali Gali.
- PG Asia –Linzhou, China.
Jury:Agust Gudmundsson.
Steward:Dennis Pagen.
-
PG Accuracy Euro – Ohrid, Former Yugoslavia, Republic of Macedonia.
Jury:Andy Cowley.
Steward:Nikki Bodill.
- PG Accuracy Asia – Wai-ao, Chinese Taipei.
Jury:Roman Pogacar.
Steward:Violeta Masteikiene.
Review of Steward reports for 2012 pre-championships.
- PG pre-World – Sopot, Bulgaria.
Steward:Leonard Grigorescu.
-
PG Accuracy pre-World – Bjelasnica, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegivina.
- PG Accuracy pre-World Games – Cali, Colombia.
Steward: Louie Joselyn.
Selection of Jury and Stewards for the 2013 championships.
- PG World – Sopot, Bulgaria.
-
PG Accuracy World Games – Cali, Colombia.
- PG Accuracy World – Bjelasnica, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Selection of Stewards for the 2013 pre-championships.
- PG European – Kapaonik-Raska, Serbia.
- PG Pan-American – Loma Bola, Tucuman, Argentina.
-
PG Accuracy European – Vrsac, Serbia.
-
PG Accuracy Malaysia – Ranau, Sabah, Malaysia.
Also…
- Extension of the Remote Jury to all Cat 1 competitions.
- Review of the process for recruiting, selecting, paying the right officials.
- Review of the Jury and Steward role.
- Necessity to rewrite the J&S Handbook.
Subcommittees and working groups
Review of reports.
- Paragliding – Calvo Burns.
- Hang-gliding – Oyvind Ellefsen.
- Aerobatics – Dennis Pagen.
-
Paragliding Accuracy – Nikki Bodill.
-
Safety – Raymond Caux.
- Software – Jörg Ewald.
- Record and Badges – Scott Torkelsen.
- Jury and Steward – Flip Koetsier.
-
Sporting Code – John Aldridge.
- Competition Structure – Stéphane Malbos.
- Pilot screening – Brian Harris.
- Competition coordination – Brian Harris.
- Website content – Stéphane Malbos.
- Environmental Affairs – Thomas Sénac.
Also…
- How can SC and WG be restructured for efficiency?
- Prospective for SC and WG Chairs for next year.
-
3-5-1 of FAI By-Laws allow us to elect the SC and WG Chairs for 2 years. Should we do that?
Budget
- Intermediary report.
- Who should pay for CIVL Bureau members’ expenses like this Bureau meeting? CIVL or the members’ federations?
Sporting Code
- Some modifications have not been implemented in the May 2012 edition of Section 7.
(“… as far as appropriate”, French proposal for PG Cat 2").
- Should it be extended to other disciplines?
Bids for cat1 competitions
2015 is a FAI World Championships year : HG, PG, PG Accuracy, HG and PG Aerobatic.
- How can we improve the quality and screening of the bids within today rules?
(Delegation from the Plenary to the Bureau to look for bidders)
- Should be change the rules altogether? Define proposals to the Plenary.
-
Should we require signed Organisers Agreement with the bid?
Review of Bids’ documents:
- Guidelines for presentation of bids.
- Bids check-list.
- Budget sample.
Practical guidelines for organisers of competition
- Review report on the project of rewriting it – Louise Joselyn
- This includes a new template for Local Regulations.
PMA, EHPU and the future of PG Competition glider
- Review meetings and projects.
-
Define strategy.
Internal Regulations
- They should be simplified, adapted to the reality of the way we work, modified so Bureau, Subcommittees and Plenary work better.
- Review the new document.
Other documents
- CIVL Handbook - Review this document published on the Web (see Front page).
- Bureau Handbook - Review this new document.
- CIVL Long Term Plan - Do we need one?
What is really long term and what is aims and purposes?
Include it in the Internal Regulations?
- Safe pro, Para pro - Needs reviewing. Who could be in charge?
Plenary meeting
- - How can it be restructured for efficiency? What can be omitted or done in simpler way?
-
- Can the SC and WG meetings be reorganized for efficiency?
-
- What do we want in the SC / WG / Plenary minutes? Who will write them?
-
- Should we change the Plenary dates? January, December, November…? Make simulations…
- - Bureau elections - See new Internal Regulations project (to come).
- Can we adapt the way Bureau is elected within today rules?
(Formalising what happened in the last Plenary: the Prez presents the people he whish to work with. All candidates introduce themselves.)
- Should we make proposal to the Plenary to change these rules?
(According to FAI Law-bys 3-2-1, we can vote for as many secretaries as we want; we don’t need to vote for a treasurer; this could give us flexibility and the possibility to choose more Bureau members that are not delegates. According to FAI Statutes 5-1-2-8, we can elect the Bureau for 2 years.)
- Should we make proposal to FAI General Conference to change these rules?
(For instance, possibility to elect the Bureau for up to 4 years.)
- Prospective for Bureau members and SC Chairs for next year.
CIVL Competition Coordinator, Secretary and PR
What is needed?
Section 7, CIVL Internal Regulation, Term of Reference
- We will need to prepare new wording to include eventual Bureau proposals to the Plenary.
- - Bid procedures?
- - Bureau members and elections?
-
- SC and WG members and elections?
-
- …?
Other pending matters…
Go through the Bureau To Do list.